In The News

Nanotechnology's Revolutionary Next Phase

By: Bruce Dorminey, Contributor,

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

The term “nanotechnology” has been bandied about so much over the last few decades that even the researcher who popularized the term is the first to point out that it’s lost its original meaning.

Nanotech, or the manipulation of matter on atomic and molecular scales, is currently used to describe micro-scale technology in everything from space technology to biotech.

As such, nanotech has already changed the world. But the fruition of atomically precise manufacturing (APM) — nanotech’s next phase — promises to create such “radical abundance” that it will not only change industry but civilization itself.

At least that’s the view of Eric Drexler, considered by most to be the father of nanotechnology. An American engineer, technologist and author with three degrees from M.I.T., Drexler is currently at the “Programme on the Impacts of Future Technology” at Oxford University in the U.K. questioned Drexler about points discussed in his forthcoming book, Radical Abundance: How a Revolution in Nanotechnology Will Change Civilization, due out in May.

Has nanotechnology, as most of the world currently understands it, been over-hyped?

At the outset, “nanotechnology” essentially meant atomically precise manufacturing (APM). But by the time something called nanotechnology won large-scale funding a decade ago, the term sometimes meant APM, and sometimes meant something more like conventional materials science. But expecting to get APM-level technologies out of typical areas of materials science is like expecting to get a Swiss watch out of a cement mixer. [APM] progress has been in the molecular sciences. People looking to materials science for progress in APM have been setting themselves up to be blindsided, because some of the most important boostrapping technologies for APM are not labeled “nanotechnology.”

In “Radical Abundance,” you note that APM-level production technology will allow a box on a desktop “to manufacture an infinite range of products drawn from a digital library.” This almost sounds like magic. How would the atoms be arranged and manipulated to facilitate the manufacturing process?

An ordinary printer shows how digital information can be used to arrange small things — pixels — to make a virtually infinite range of images. By doing something similar with small bits of matter, and APM-level technologies can fabricate a virtually infinite range of products. 3D printing also illustrates this principle.

Imagine factory machinery putting small components together to make larger components and you have a good idea of how APM-based production can work. Down at the bottom, the parts are simple molecules from ordinary commercial materials in a can or a drum, somewhat like large ink cartridges. Simple molecules are atomically precise, so they make a good starting point for atomically precise manufacturing. This works if the factory machines themselves are atomically precise and guide molecular motions accurately enough, and physics shows that nanoscale machines can, in fact, do this.

Factories that use very small machines can be very compact, just a few times larger than what they produce. A desktop-scale machine could manufacture a tablet computer or a roll of solar photovoltaic cells.

What about the cost-effectiveness of APM?

Cost-effectiveness depends on both production cost and product value. APM products can have very high performance and value because atomically precise materials based on carbon nanotubes can be extremely strong and lightweight, because atomically precise computer devices can far outperform today’s nanoscale electronics, and so on through a range of other examples.

Production costs can be low because the raw materials are inexpensive and the processing can go straight from raw materials to final products using highly productive machinery. The key insight here is that nanoscale mechanical devices can move and act almost exactly like larger machines, but moving at much higher frequencies. This is a consequence of physical scaling laws of the kind that [physicist] Richard Feynman described almost 50 years ago, and it enables high throughput. So the prospect is a technology that combines high performance with low cost, typically by large factors.

How can what you term the “cardinal rules of exploratory engineering” be applied to developing APM?

It’s important to ask the right questions. This means setting aside questions of development dates, market prospects, and so on, and instead asking, “What does physics tell us about what is and isn’t possible under physical law?”

To be an exploratory engineer means applying conservative engineering principles — margins of safety, redundant options, and so on — and design analysis based on well-established, textbook-quality scientific knowledge. This is the only way to draw reliable conclusions about what can be accomplished.

The place to look for new and surprising results is in the range of technologies that are beyond reach of current fabrication technologies. APM-level technologies are in this range. We can see paths forward toward these technologies — using today’s molecular tools to step by step build better tools. But a clear view isn’t the same as a short path. APM-level technologies are not around the corner.

Would APM make revolutionary inroads into biotech — specifically, in developing nano-machines that could unclog arteries; reverse brain damage in stroke victims; or even manufacture a truly robust artificial heart?

APM is very different from biotechnology (think of the difference between a car and a horse). But we already see nanoscale atomically precise devices being used to read and synthesize DNA, devices borrowed from biological molecular machinery. Nanoscale atomically precise technologies like these can be made much faster and more efficient. Nanomedicine is already researching nanoscale functional particles that can circulate in the body and target cancer cells. Technologies of this kind have enormous room for improvement, and advances in atomically precise fabrication will be the key. The body relies on atomically precise devices to do its work, and atomically precise devices are the best way to accomplish precise medical interventions at the molecular level.

Would APM lower the cost of access to outer space?

The main barrier to space activity today is cost. With the ability to make materials tens of times stronger and lighter than aluminum, and at a low cost per kilogram, access to space becomes far more practical. The difficulties of producing high-performance, low-defect, high-reliability systems also decline sharply with atomically precise manufacturing.

In what fields would APM cause the most pronounced economic disruption and the collapse of global supply chains to more local chains?

The digital revolution had far-reaching effects on information industries. APM-based production promises to have similarly far-reaching effects, but transposed into the world of physical products. In thinking about implications for international trade and economic organization, three aspects should be kept in mind: a shift from scarce to common raw materials, a shift from long supply chains to more direct paths from raw materials to finished products, and a shift toward flexible, localized manufacturing based on production systems with capabilities that are comparable on-demand printing. This is enough to at least suggest the scope of the changes to expect from a mature form of APM-based production — which again is a clear prospect but emphatically not around the corner.

Would APM help make war obsolete?

I don’t see that anything will make war obsolete, but the prospect of APM-level technologies changes national interests in two major ways:

By deeply reducing the demand for scarce resources — including petroleum — APM technologies will reduce the motivations for geopolitical struggles for what are now considered strategic resources.

Secondly, by making calculations of future military power radically uncertain, the prospect of these technologies gives good reason to examine approaches to cooperative development merged with confidence-building mutual transparency among major powers. Changes in national interests will call for developing [military] contingency plans premised on the emergence of these technologies.

When will we actually see the onset of the APM revolution?

The paths forward require further advances in atomically precise fabrication, an area that began with organic chemistry more than a century ago and continues to make great strides. A sharper engineering focus will bring faster progress and further rewards, just as progress in atomically precise fabrication has brought rewards since the beginning in science, industry, and medicine.

Although advanced objectives like full-scale APM stand beyond a normal business R&D investment horizon, incremental steps in key technologies are steadily emerging. But we need a more focused program of design, analysis, research, and development.

Do all roads lead to APM? Thus, is some form of APM likely to be ubiquitous among intelligent civilizations in the galaxy, if of course such civilizations exist?

There’s no substitute for atomic precision because there’s no substitute for precisely controlling the structure of matter. The only known way to do this is by guiding the motion of molecules to put them in place, according to plan, by means of directed bonding — in other words, by some form of atomically precise manufacturing. Since there are many ways to develop these technologies, I’d say that all roads forward do indeed lead to APM.

Read Story on

In The News

December 8, 2016
Quantum Materials Ships Quantum Dot Sample Sets
Display Daily

April 13, 2016
SID Launches Marketing Executives Forum at Display Week 2016
Society for Information Display

March 1, 2016
Quantum Materials Corp To Drive QD Production
Quantum Dots Forum

December, 2015
Vista Partners Has Initiated Coverage on Quantum Materials Corp.

November, 2014
Quantum Materials Scales Up Quantum Dot Production for Solar, Display and Lighting Markets

Friday, April 10, 2015
Quantum Dot Dark Horse
SD Torrey Hills Capital

Tuesday, February 26, 2013
A Forbes interview with Eric Drexler, renown Technologist and Author of "Radical Abundance: How a Revolution in Nanotechnology Will Change Civilization, due out in May.

Thursday, October 30, 2014
Samsung, LG turn to quantum dots as OLED still too pricey

Wednesday, August 20, 2014
Quantum Dot Manufacturing to get Less Expensive

Wednesday, August 20, 2014
Quantum Materials acquires patents from German company
Austin Business Journal

Friday, July 11, 2014
3D Tetrapod Quantum Dots Outperform
EE Times

Monday, June 30, 2014
Quantum Materials Corporation Secures Technology to 3D Print Quantum Dots for Anti-Counterfeiting

Wednesday, June 18, 2014
Nanoengineering boosts carrier multiplication in quantum dots four-fold

Sunday, June 1, 2014
Market Potential of Quantum Dots in the TV Display Industry

Tuesday, May 27, 2014
Quantum Materials plans to hire more workers for San Marcos facility
Austin Business Journal

Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Quantum Materials Now Shipping Size-Optimized Metallic Oxide Particles To Major Asian Electronics Firm
Bio News Texas

Thursday, December 12, 2013
Quantum Materials Corp. Adds Variety to Short List of Display-Oriented Quantum Dot Manufacturers in North America
Display Central

Saturday, November 16, 2013
Plugged In: San Marcos tech company bets big on tiny quantum dots
Austin-American Statesman

Thursday, October 24, 2013
Old technology enables new approaches to sustainability
Nevada Today

Thursday, October 3, 2013
Texas State University, Quantum Materials Enter Unique University-Industry Partnership to Spur Tetrapod Quantum Dot Commercialization
Bio News Texas

Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Oklahoma-based tech company relocating headquarters to Austin
Austin-American Statesman